<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Linguists Are True Code Artists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/</link>
	<description>Ideas for building efficient developers and software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:43:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tejesh.  I was a little bothered that the linguistic craft of code could not indeed be considered an art form.  However, with the additional caveat that a true artist arrives at his art by first mastering technique; often through many, many failures, and lessons.  Even DaVinci must have had to master technique first before he was publicly considered an artist.  I believe, though, that the artist was always there...it was the production, the medium, and the public judgment thereafter that earned him the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tejesh.  I was a little bothered that the linguistic craft of code could not indeed be considered an art form.  However, with the additional caveat that a true artist arrives at his art by first mastering technique; often through many, many failures, and lessons.  Even DaVinci must have had to master technique first before he was publicly considered an artist.  I believe, though, that the artist was always there&#8230;it was the production, the medium, and the public judgment thereafter that earned him the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tejesh</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Tejesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>When I first read your original post about engg vs artist..I was little upset where you called software engineer aren&#039;t code artist..but I didnt comment on the post because every person has a right to have an opinion...but this post speaks out exactly what I feel about software engineers (one who has mastered the language enough to write creative product)..

good one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first read your original post about engg vs artist..I was little upset where you called software engineer aren&#8217;t code artist..but I didnt comment on the post because every person has a right to have an opinion&#8230;but this post speaks out exactly what I feel about software engineers (one who has mastered the language enough to write creative product)..</p>
<p>good one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie (Oxagile Software Outsourcing)</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie (Oxagile Software Outsourcing)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/why-linguists-are-true-code-artists/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Awesome! Thanks -)

Being a linguist (at least I&#039;m supposed to be ;-)I cannot but agree to that.

And luckily, here at Oxagile we have both or I&#039;d better say &#039;all in one&#039; - artistic developers with a wealth of practical experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Thanks -)</p>
<p>Being a linguist (at least I&#8217;m supposed to be ;-)I cannot but agree to that.</p>
<p>And luckily, here at Oxagile we have both or I&#8217;d better say &#8216;all in one&#8217; &#8211; artistic developers with a wealth of practical experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
