<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Reusable Piece Of Code Ever&#8230;Period</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/</link>
	<description>Ideas for building efficient developers and software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: social democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>social democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Went googling for exactly this. Data in code, possibly bad, taking it under advisement. Not clear why good design principles require me to go over the wire to query some data store and/or deserialize this info if I have a map application that&#039;s going to work this set over and over and over again and I just want to have the damn thing on hand and someone else shipped it in an assembly already. Yes -- *sigh* americans.

I do like the idea of limiting the number of states. It&#039;s anti-imperialist. But it locks our current set in, and there&#039;s a few I&#039;d rather be rid of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went googling for exactly this. Data in code, possibly bad, taking it under advisement. Not clear why good design principles require me to go over the wire to query some data store and/or deserialize this info if I have a map application that&#8217;s going to work this set over and over and over again and I just want to have the damn thing on hand and someone else shipped it in an assembly already. Yes &#8212; *sigh* americans.</p>
<p>I do like the idea of limiting the number of states. It&#8217;s anti-imperialist. But it locks our current set in, and there&#8217;s a few I&#8217;d rather be rid of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdfadfadfad</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>asdfadfadfad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>there is life out of the US</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is life out of the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zkr</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Zkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Wait, wait wait I got it.
What about thisssss...... 

================================
using System;
using System.ComponentModel;

namespace Codesqueeze.Entities
{
    public enum Boolean
    {
        [Description(“true”)]
        TRUE,
        [Description(“false”)]
        FALSE
    }
}

Ahh??? Ahh?? Ahh??
That works everywhere!!! America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania.



he he he.

Oh... United Steterns... ( I mean Americans )

Nice try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, wait wait I got it.<br />
What about thisssss&#8230;&#8230; </p>
<p>================================<br />
using System;<br />
using System.ComponentModel;</p>
<p>namespace Codesqueeze.Entities<br />
{<br />
    public enum Boolean<br />
    {<br />
        [Description(“true”)]<br />
        TRUE,<br />
        [Description(“false”)]<br />
        FALSE<br />
    }<br />
}</p>
<p>Ahh??? Ahh?? Ahh??<br />
That works everywhere!!! America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania.</p>
<p>he he he.</p>
<p>Oh&#8230; United Steterns&#8230; ( I mean Americans )</p>
<p>Nice try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hansi</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>hansi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>sorry, but this post is terrible. 

the weirdest argument is the one about &quot;more people receiving outsourcing work from the us&quot;. 

i mean... yea, whatever... 
that&#039;s all i gotta add to this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, but this post is terrible. </p>
<p>the weirdest argument is the one about &#8220;more people receiving outsourcing work from the us&#8221;. </p>
<p>i mean&#8230; yea, whatever&#8230;<br />
that&#8217;s all i gotta add to this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-04-24 &#171; Tathata - d&#8217; Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-04-24 &#171; Tathata - d&#8217; Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>[...] The Most Reusable Piece Of Code Ever…Period (tags: .net code java snippets) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Most Reusable Piece Of Code Ever…Period (tags: .net code java snippets) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackAdder</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackAdder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>Well if it is the most reusable piece of code, it should be part of some library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if it is the most reusable piece of code, it should be part of some library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quangntenemy</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>quangntenemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t beat System.out.println(&quot;Hello world!&quot;);</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t beat System.out.println(&#8221;Hello world!&#8221;);</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>Keep data in the code?
Worse practice ever!

Here is my most usable statement.
I bet it&#039;s used most of all:

;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep data in the code?<br />
Worse practice ever!</p>
<p>Here is my most usable statement.<br />
I bet it&#8217;s used most of all:</p>
<p>;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wiebe</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Wiebe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>I think my most useful piece of code might be this:

public interface ICommand
{
    void Execute();
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my most useful piece of code might be this:</p>
<p>public interface ICommand<br />
{<br />
    void Execute();<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill Chilingarashvili</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill Chilingarashvili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-most-reusable-piece-of-code-everperiod/#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>You are hardcoding the states!
What if after some time US will have more states? You will have to rewrite all the places where you used this code 
(just joking) :)

Seriously - my most reusable snippet is Logger helper class that I am moving to every new project. I think it&#039;s good point to move it to the class library</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are hardcoding the states!<br />
What if after some time US will have more states? You will have to rewrite all the places where you used this code<br />
(just joking) :)</p>
<p>Seriously &#8211; my most reusable snippet is Logger helper class that I am moving to every new project. I think it&#8217;s good point to move it to the class library</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
