<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Broken Iron Triangle Is Broken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/</link>
	<description>Ideas for building efficient developers and software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:29:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Trouble With Triangles - Life of an Agile Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-9847</link>
		<dc:creator>The Trouble With Triangles - Life of an Agile Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-9847</guid>
		<description>[...] few years. There’s Jurgen Appelo’s Iron Square, Jim Highsmith’s Agile Triangle, Max Pool’s Iron Line, and any number of other variations. At first glance, these seem like good thought models which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few years. There’s Jurgen Appelo’s Iron Square, Jim Highsmith’s Agile Triangle, Max Pool’s Iron Line, and any number of other variations. At first glance, these seem like good thought models which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Pool</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Pool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>@Karl

The only thing I don&#039;t like about the Contractors Triangle is it places quality at one of the corners.  In my mind, lack of unit tests and quality is never an option - it cuts too deeply into my professional pride.

Would you want your name attached to crummy software even if it was the best business decision for your client? Personal preference I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karl</p>
<p>The only thing I don&#8217;t like about the Contractors Triangle is it places quality at one of the corners.  In my mind, lack of unit tests and quality is never an option &#8211; it cuts too deeply into my professional pride.</p>
<p>Would you want your name attached to crummy software even if it was the best business decision for your client? Personal preference I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relationship &#187; The Broken Iron Triangle Is Broken</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Relationship &#187; The Broken Iron Triangle Is Broken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>[...] mariooster wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIf you have a good working relationship with your client, you can instead, use the Iron Line as a scale which to balance the two end points. Do they want 80% control of the budget, thus giving up 80% control of the scope? &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mariooster wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIf you have a good working relationship with your client, you can instead, use the Iron Line as a scale which to balance the two end points. Do they want 80% control of the budget, thus giving up 80% control of the scope? &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Katzke</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Katzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/the-broken-iron-triangle-is-broken/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>I usually use the &quot;Contractor&#039;s Triangle:&quot; -- &quot;Good, Fast, Cheap, pick any two&quot; to get an idea of what my client wanted before we started a project. But I *insisted* on having a good control of scope by implementing a ticket system and setting up a &quot;Current&quot;, &quot;Next&quot;, &quot;Future&quot; version system. We&#039;d go through a list of tickets together in Excel and I&#039;d put my choices and they could confirm them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually use the &#8220;Contractor&#8217;s Triangle:&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;Good, Fast, Cheap, pick any two&#8221; to get an idea of what my client wanted before we started a project. But I *insisted* on having a good control of scope by implementing a ticket system and setting up a &#8220;Current&#8221;, &#8220;Next&#8221;, &#8220;Future&#8221; version system. We&#8217;d go through a list of tickets together in Excel and I&#8217;d put my choices and they could confirm them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
