<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Features Do Not Exist (Only Benefits)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/</link>
	<description>Ideas for building efficient developers and software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:19:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fervent Coder</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>Fervent Coder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>Well said! Brilliant.  


Or perhaps Paula Bean Brillant? ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! Brilliant.  </p>
<p>Or perhaps Paula Bean Brillant? ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurgen Appelo</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurgen Appelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>Max, I almost forgot, my reply to this post is here...

http://www.noop.nl/2008/07/oh-my-god-they-fixed-the-bug-you-bastards.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, I almost forgot, my reply to this post is here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.noop.nl/2008/07/oh-my-god-they-fixed-the-bug-you-bastards.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.noop.nl/2008/07/oh-.....tards.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjan`s World &#187; LINKBLOG for June 25, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2543</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan`s World &#187; LINKBLOG for June 25, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2543</guid>
		<description>[...] Features Do Not Exist (Only Benefits) - Max Pool Happy to see Max continue his video messages. This time a good example of why we &#8216; need to quit thinking and speaking in terms of features, and start talking to our clients in terms of the benefits that they will gain &#8216; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Features Do Not Exist (Only Benefits) &#8211; Max Pool Happy to see Max continue his video messages. This time a good example of why we &#8216; need to quit thinking and speaking in terms of features, and start talking to our clients in terms of the benefits that they will gain &#8216; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Deltener</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Deltener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>LOL I&#039;m glad to see I&#039;m not the only one that finds small irritants in society that hint to large scale fundamental issues. I would of thought the exact same thing...60% lighter...well whoopty doo..what the @#$$ does that mean? enjoyed the post :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL I&#8217;m glad to see I&#8217;m not the only one that finds small irritants in society that hint to large scale fundamental issues. I would of thought the exact same thing&#8230;60% lighter&#8230;well whoopty doo..what the @#$$ does that mean? enjoyed the post :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop - June 25, 2008 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop - June 25, 2008 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>[...] Features Do Not Exist (Only Benefits) (Max Pool) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Features Do Not Exist (Only Benefits) (Max Pool) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Pool</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Pool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>@Scott,

I understand why you would write specs to describe an experience, but is there a fine difference between application &quot;behavior&quot; and user &quot;experience&quot; besides from which direction you are viewing?  

From one point of view they seem to be the same thing, from another potentially different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott,</p>
<p>I understand why you would write specs to describe an experience, but is there a fine difference between application &#8220;behavior&#8221; and user &#8220;experience&#8221; besides from which direction you are viewing?  </p>
<p>From one point of view they seem to be the same thing, from another potentially different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bellware</title>
		<link>http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Bellware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesqueeze.com/features-do-not-exist-only-benefits/#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>Nicely done.

In BDD, I tend refer &quot;benefit&quot; as &quot;experience&quot;.  When I write executable specs, I write them to describe the experience rather than the implementation.

I&#039;m reticent to conclude that I&#039;m delivering benefit at the time I&#039;m writing specs.  We believe or suspect that there&#039;s benefit, but we only really know this at a later time.

Similarly, I don&#039;t refer to a user story template as &quot;As a , I want to  so that &quot;.  My preferred template is &quot;As a , I want to  so that &quot;.  There may or may not be business value involved.  That often remains to be seen as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done.</p>
<p>In BDD, I tend refer &#8220;benefit&#8221; as &#8220;experience&#8221;.  When I write executable specs, I write them to describe the experience rather than the implementation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reticent to conclude that I&#8217;m delivering benefit at the time I&#8217;m writing specs.  We believe or suspect that there&#8217;s benefit, but we only really know this at a later time.</p>
<p>Similarly, I don&#8217;t refer to a user story template as &#8220;As a , I want to  so that &#8220;.  My preferred template is &#8220;As a , I want to  so that &#8220;.  There may or may not be business value involved.  That often remains to be seen as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
